
|
|
Small Group #3. Balancing Collaboration with Competition- Public/Public,
Public Private Partnerships
< Back
to Economic Diversity Small Group Summary
Small Group members:
Barozyk, Busha, Matthes, Metcalf, Minsky, Mortell,
Weber, Wilcox, Chesser, Collins, Caseltine, Perez
Vision Goals
- The Treasure Coast will establish a business environment that
supports re-invention and risk taking and balance collaboration with
competition.
- The Treasure Coast will develop an understanding of the positive
role and impact of a diverse economy and businesses on the quality
of life in communities and the prosperity of citizens throughout
the region.
Small Group Question
How can public/public and public/private partnerships on education,
infrastructure and other topics contribute to achieving a diverse and
prosperous regional economy?
Small Group General Discussion comments-8-5
- Regionalization? What impact will competing within the region
have on these strategies? What’s the philosophy for separating
what benefits who area uniformly?
- Presentations compared each county to metro average vs. taking
TC together to compare as a region
- When Indian River does marketing, they market IR first. But also
connects with and coordinates other counties in the region.
- Think of planning for infrastructure, telecommunications, education
etc. regionally. Specific economic development projects happen locally.
- Things to do regionally in economic development will “lift
all boats”
- Provide more support for good initiatives underway. Identify any
gaps in things to do. E.g. need a n/s road/corridor through all 3
counties?
- Still don’t have tools available to make sure our children
can come back to high wage jobs.
- Are differences in the region actually strengths? Opportunities
may vary based on the location
- Post secondary education (FAU/IRCC) easier to look at regional
approach. But look at K-12 system. (e.g. Tech prep jointly developed
grants). E.g. partnerships for lobbying in Tallahassee . Help with
forecasting and planning and inter local agreements from TCRPC for
school districts.
- Use the ULI study conclusions as framework for thinking about
partnerships: improved/approved land; money to invest in economic
development; first rate education; first rate workforce
Strategies for Improved/approved land partnership strategies
- Need to identify/inventory industrial/non residential sites
that exist and their condition throughout the region. Need to know
how short we are on this.
- Need funding to improve infrastructure. Need support of the
local governments to secure such funding. Look for partnerships
working with Fed govt. sources of funding, e.g. EDA grant application
is a good e.g. of this. E.g. EPA brownfields e.g. for funding support.
- Work to streamline approval processes for high priority economic
development initiatives. Is this a local question only? E.g. “expedited
permitting review process” for the Scripps; use a similar
process for targeted industries?
- Encourage partnerships between developers of industrial sites
and local govt. for minimizing risks and increasing the possibility
of getting more improved/approved land
- Consider land set asides and land banking for infrastructure---e.g.
parks, rec and schools
- Seek to preserve the urban service area in 3 counties as a strategy
for creating opportunities for siting industrial areas.
- Infill development may be part of the puzzle here on improved/approved
lands
Plenary Discussion Comments, Concerns and Suggestions- 8-6
- Opportunities for charter schools should be part of the education
discussion
- F-clarify preserve the urban service area, partnerships between
landowners and developers within the urban services area
- Factor in the CERP footprints as a part of the analysis of approved
lands or lands proposed for development
- There will need to be creative approaches to acquiring land needed
for CERP and other environmental purposes
- Planning solutions such as mixed use communities maybe part of
the answer
Small Group Discussion comments-8-5
- Focus on improving County-city relationships on land use and growth
as they relate to economic development strategies. (In general, municipality
may be better suited to put together industrial parks)
- Is this principally a local issue not a regional one?
Funding for/ investment in economic development- partnerships
Draft
Objectives
- Promote efforts in improving education and understanding of
importance of economic diversity such as a Treasure Coast Leadership
initiative? (look at model in SF)
- Build on and find ways to help support successful regional ed
efforts of EDCs
- What if counties in the region joined together to site and build
a regional airport? Open up the old airports can become industrial
parks.
- Explore the creation of regional source of revenue to aid in
economic development efforts- flexible up front funds (tax deferred
etc)
- Analyze the possibilities of government developed industrial
parks.
- Analyze whether to develop a regional industrial development
authority. Models for this?
Plenary Discussion Comments, Concerns and Suggestions- 8-6
- St Lucie County makes sense as a site for an airport
- Using what is already there, Wickham Airport has more potential,
fiber/ wired needs to be installed
- All medium size airports in Florida are losing money
- There is a lot of capacity at our current airport
First class education partnerships
Draft Objectives
- Improve and fund the regional school system adequately in order
to contribute to economic diversity and prosperity in region.
Plenary Discussion Comments, Concerns and Suggestions- 8-6
- Make charter school partnerships an objective
- Full cost accounting for schools
- Consider implementing some form of school concurrency - this is
an opportunity for partnerships
- Martin County is beginning full cost accounting
- More information on state impact fee caps for schools
- Indian River County is looking at school impact fees for new growth
- Orange County has some interesting school concurrency strategies
- We need to keep the idea of regionalism rather than look at individual
county strategies
Small Group Discussion Comments-8-5
- K-12 opportunities for partnerships across county lines- interlocal
agreements for services etc.? E.g. a “regional high school”?
Sharing facilities, services etc. across county lines (St. Lucie
shares facilities)
- Operations (based on students enrolled in the schools) vs. capital
budget (2 mils discretionary locally- stays in county). E.g. a 3
county school board?
- How to deal with funding gaps projected in terms of school demographics
- Look at charter schools role and partnerships in improving the
K-12 school system?
- Post secondary= FAU/IRCC working together regionally
First class workforce partnerships
Draft Objective
- Build on existing TC model for coordinating workforce development
in region? Do more of the same with more $$?
Plenary Discussion Comments, Concerns and Suggestions- 8-6
- Partnership between the regional boards and the state
Small Group Discussion Comments- 8-5
- Need a first class working environment in place to attract the
work force
- Relates to the schools/universities participating- but what is
here to put these students to work?
- A regional airport could bring high wage jobs related the facility.
|
 |